Quality assurance in surgical trials of arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: A systematic review, a narrative exploration and expert recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Introducing new procedures and challenging established paradigms requires well-designed randomised controlled trials (RCT). However, RCT in surgery present unique challenges with much of treatment tailored to the individual patient circumstances, refined by experience and limited by organisational factors. There has been considerable debate over the outcomes of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) compared to AVF, but any differences may reflect differing practice and potential variability. It is essential, therefore, when considering an RCT of a novel surgical procedure or device that quality assurance (QA) is defined for both the new approach and the comparator. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the QA standards performed in RCT of AVG using a multi-national, multi-disciplinary approach and propose an approach for future RCT. METHOD: The methods of this have been previously registered (PROSPERO: CRD420234284280) and published. In summary, a four-stage review was performed: identification of RCT of AVG, initial review, multidisciplinary appraisal of QA methods and reconciliation. QA measures were sought in four areas - generic, credentialing, standardisation and monitoring, with data abstracted by a multi-national, multi-speciality review body. RESULTS: QA in RCT involving AVG in all four domains is highly variable, often sub-optimally described and has not improved over the past three decades. Few RCT established or defined a pre-RCT level of experience, none documented a pre-trial education programme, or had minimal standards of peri-operative management, no study had a defined pre-trial monitoring programme, and none assessed technical performance. CONCLUSION: QA in RCT is a relatively new area that is expanding to ensure evidence is reliable and reproducible. This review demonstrates that QA has not previously been detailed, but can be measured in surgical RCT of vascular access, and that a four-domain approach can easily be implemented into future RCT.

A practical review of barriers and challenges to a definitive randomised trial of grafts versus fistula.

A definitive randomised controlled trial of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) versus arteriovenous grafts (AVG) has been advocated for more than a decade, but as yet, none has been completed. The aim of this article is to summarise the theoretical barriers, review the difficulties in trial design and practicalities that have thus far prevented this from occurring.

An ELISA Using Synthetic Mycolic Acid-Based Antigens with DIVA Potential for Diagnosing Johne's Disease in Cattle.

THE PROBLEM: Ante-mortem diagnosis of Johne's disease, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), is normally achieved through faecal culture, PCR, or serological tests, but agreement as to which samples are positive for Johne's disease is often poor and sensitivities are low, particularly in early-stage infections. The potential solution: Mycobacterial cells contain very complex characteristic mixtures of mycolic acid derivatives that elicit antibodies during infection; this has been used to detect infections in humans. Here, we explore its application in providing an assay differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA assay) for Johne's disease in cattle. METHOD: Antibody responses to different classes of mycolic acid derivatives were measured using ELISA for serum from cattle positive for MAP by both faecal PCR and commercial serum ELISA, or just by PCR, and from animals from herds with no history of Johne's disease, bovine tuberculosis reactors, BCG-vaccinated, BCG-vaccinated and M. bovis-infected, and Gudair-vaccinated animals. RESULTS: The best-performing antigens, ZAM295 and ST123-the latter a molecule present in the cells of MAP but not of Mycobacterium bovis-achieved a sensitivity of 75% and 62.5%, respectively, for serum from animals positive by both faecal PCR and a commercial MAP serum ELISA, at a specificity of 94% compared to 80 no-history negatives. Combining the results of separate assays with two antigens (ST123 and JRRR121) increased the sensitivity/specificity to 75/97.5%. At the same cut-offs, animals vaccinated with Gudair or BCG vaccines and bTB reactors showed a similar specificity. The specificity in BCG-vaccinated but M. bovis-infected animals dropped to 85%. Combining the results of two antigens gave a sensitivity/specificity of 37.5/97.5% for the full set of 80 PCR-positive samples, detecting 30 positives compared 16 for IDEXX. CONCLUSION: Serum ELISA using synthetic lipids distinguishes effectively between MAP-negative cattle samples and those positive by both PCR and a commercial MAP serodiagnostic, without interference by Gudair or BCG vaccination. It identified almost twice as many PCR positives as the commercial serodiagnostic, offering the possibility of earlier detection of infection.

What are the observed procedural costs of vascular access surgery? Protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: A central component in the introduction of a novel surgical procedure or technique is an evaluation of its cost efficiency when compared with a benchmark standard of care. Accurate assessment of costs is thus essential in ensuring appropriate allocation of resources within a healthcare system. The treatment of kidney failure requires a significant volume of resources, and vascular access provision is the main modifiable cost. The costs of providing this service are obscured by generic NHS reference costs, which lack adequate granularity to allow meaningful comparisons between treatments. The aim of this systematic review will be to assess the reporting of procedural costs in all published economic analyses of vascular access surgery and perform a comparison of the reported procedural costs involved in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation. This will provide an estimate as to the accuracy of the NHS reference costs in this field. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed. A systematic search will be performed of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify full-text economic analyses of vascular access for haemodialysis in which the procedural cost of AVF or AVG creation is reported. Publications in English from 1 January 2000 to 30 August 2023, will be eligible for inclusion. Studies will be selected by title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies not reporting the procedural costs of surgery will be excluded. Data collected will pertain to procedural costs of AVF and AVG creation. Costs will be adjusted to a common currency using a gross domestic product (GDP) deflator index and conversion rates based on purchasing power parities for GDP. Comparison with NHS reference costs will indicate their reliability for use in future economic analyses in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023458779.

Patient-Centred, Technology-Based Interventions for High Treatment Burden: An Overview of the State of the Art.

This study provides an overview of recent efforts to develop technology-based interventions for patients with high treatment burden. Adoption of a technological intervention for high treatment burden will depend on a range of factors, including: the reliability and accessibility of the technology, patient factors including age, socio-economic factors, technology literacy, overall health status and personal priorities - as well as the perceived benefits provided by the technology intervention, from the perspectives of both patients and clinicians.

Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention.

BACKGROUND: Cephalic arch stenoses (CAS) occur in near 70% of elbow arteriovenous fistulas. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains first-line treatment despite documented stent-grafts (SG) efficacy. The study aim is to report long-term outcomes based on initial treatment of CAS. METHODS: Retrospective review of 12-year data in single tertiary centre. Outcomes included technical success, rupture rate, primary patency (PP), dialysis performance; categorical variables assessed via χ2 or Fisher's; nonparametric tests used for skewed data. Kaplan-Meier analysis used for PP and cumulative patency. Cox proportional hazard regression model to assess explanatory variables in PP. RESULTS: One hundred one brachio- and radiocephalic fistulas with CAS were included. SG as first intervention had higher success than PTA (85% vs 61%, p = 0.003). Rupture occurred in 9/85 (10.6%) PTA vs 0% in SG (p = 0.046). In a subgroup with poor urea reduction rate (URR), both PTA and SG improved dialysis performance post-intervention (p = 0.002). SG demonstrated better PP than PTA (79,73,60% patency at 3, 6, 9 months; versus 71,51,47%; p = 0.195) and cumulative patency (73,61,61% at 1, 2, 3 years; versus 60,34,26%; p < 0.001). Of the variables analyzed, technical success of PTA was the only discriminating factor (coeff.-1.01; RR 35%, p = 0.035). Accesses that underwent secondary stenting performed better than primarily stented CAS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SG superiority is confirmed in CAS, particularly when angioplasty is unsuccessful. While PTA has short-lived benefits, it can improve dialysis performance. Other than higher success rate, primary CAS stenting did not have advantages compared to post-PTA stenting in our study. Other factors related to inflow, outflow, conduit characteristics are presumed to be involved in access longevity.

Early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts: Multidisciplinary learning is essential to optimize outcomes.

BACKGROUND: It is likely that there will be an increasing role for early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) with a wider recognition of the need to tailor vascular access to avoid futile procedures and unnecessary TCVC. However, experience of these products is not common and limited to early surgical adopters, with little information on the systemic changes and multi-disciplinary care needed to optimize outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the impact of a multi-disciplinary approach on quantifiable outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 295 ecAVG implanted over an 8-year time-period was performed. Indicative outcomes were chosen to reflect nephrology (patient selection), nursing care (cannulation complications of infection and pseudoaneurysm) and radiology (thrombosis) on cumulative impact (functional patency) over three distinct time periods. RESULTS: The incidence of ecAVG increased 10-fold over the three time periods. The use of ecAVG changed significantly from salvage tertiary access to TCVC avoidance and salvage of existing AVF. Nursing complications reduced markedly with significantly fewer over-cannulation episodes and pseudo-aneurysms. With an improved pro-active surveillance programme, the time to first thrombosis doubled and the risk of thrombosis halved. Ultimately this resulted in significantly improved functional patency with a risk of ecAVG loss less than one-third by the last time-period. CONCLUSIONS: All aspects of ecAVG use require scrutiny and critical appraisal. Failure or success is not simply achieved by performing good technical surgery with an efficacious product, but by the care taken across a wide range of elements spanning case selection, implantation, use and maintenance.

Kidney transplant outcomes in patients with antibodies to human neutrophil antigen 3a.

BACKGROUND: Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney transplants has been shown to occur in the absence of a known donor specific antibody to human leucocyte antigen (HLA). Antibodies to the human neutrophil antigen (HNA) system have been detected in kidney transplant recipients and linked to ABMR in the absence of an HLA donor specific antibody (DSA), but there remains limited literature regarding this. METHODS: Case series analysis was carried out examining three cases of HNA-3a antibody positive flow cytometry cross match (FC-XM) from two transplant centres in Scotland. RESULTS: All patients included were female and had been sensitised as a result of pregnancy. One live donor recipient with HNA-3a antibodies identified prior to transplant received ATG induction and has had a good outcome. The remaining two patients received deceased donor transplants. HNA-3a antibodies were indicated following a retrospective flow cytometry crossmatch. Both patients received Basiliximab induction and both have experienced ABMR requiring supplementary immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted rate of HNA-3a antibodies amongst patients awaiting kidney transplant in the UK is <1%. However, with increasing evidence to support a role for HNA-3a antibodies in the development of ABMR there may be value in screening at risk groups to allow for augmented immunosuppression to be considered at the time of kidney transplant.

Quality assurance in surgical trials of arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Decisions regarding the optimal vascular access for haemodialysis patients are becoming increasingly complex, and the provision of vascular access is open to variations in systems of care as well as surgical experience and practice. Two main surgical options are recognised: arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft (AVG). All recommendations regarding AVG are based on a limited number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). It is essential that when considering an RCT of a surgical procedure, an appropriate definition of quality assurance (QA) is made for both the new approach and the comparator, otherwise replication of results or implementation into clinical practice may differ from published results. The aim of this systematic review will be to assess the methodological quality of RCT involving AVG, and the QA measures implemented in delivering interventions in these trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed. A systematic search will be performed of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature. Studies will be selected by title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected will pertain to generic measures of QA, credentialing of investigators, procedural standardisation and performance monitoring. Trial methodology will be compared against a standardised template developed by a multinational, multispecialty review body with experience in vascular access. A narrative approach will be taken to synthesise and report data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the ultimate aim of providing recommendations for future RCT of AVG design.

Recruitment into randomised trials of arteriovenous grafts: A systematic review.

Although randomised controlled trials (RCT) are considered the optimal form of evidence, there are relatively few in surgery. Surgical RCT are particularly likely to be discontinued with poor recruitment cited as a leading reason. Surgical RCT present challenges over and above those seen in drug trials as the treatment under study may vary between procedures, between surgeons in one unit, and between units in multi-centred RCT. The most contentious and debated area of vascular access remains the role of arteriovenous grafts, and thus the quality of the data that is used to support opinions, guidelines and recommendations is critical. The aim of this review was to determine the extent of variation in the planning and recruitment in all RCT involving AVG. The findings of this are stark: there have been only 31 RCT performed in 31 years, the vast majority of which exhibited major limitations severe enough to undermine the results. This underlines the need for better quality RCT and data, and further inform the design of future studies. Perhaps most fundamental is the planning for a RCT that accounts for the intended population, the uptake of a RCT and the attrition for the significant co-morbidity in this population.

Pre-emptive or reactive treatment, angioplasty or stent-graft? The outcome for interventions for venous stenosis in early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts.

BACKGROUND: Early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) have good initial patency, but frequent episodes of reintervention for venous stenosis (VS) and thrombosis limit their use. Stent grafts (SG) have shown promise in reducing re-interventions and improving functional patency for dysfunctional ecAVG and recurrent VS. There is little data on the impact of stent grafts as the first elective procedure for VS. The aim of this study was to determine firstly, if treating VS whilst asymptomatic has a better outcome than treating after presentation with thrombosis; and secondly, to determine the best initial treatment for asymptomatic VS: SG or angioplasty. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 259 ecAVG with a sutured anastomosis. The case-mix and outcomes of 153 who presented with VS was analysed by presentation (elective at surveillance or emergency following thrombosis), and then for only elective patients, by treatment (SG vs angioplasty). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in case-mix and time to presentation by mode of presentation (100 elective and 53 with thrombosis) other than a higher rate of pro-thrombotic disorders in thrombosed ecAVG. Thrombosed ecAVG had poorer outcomes with increased re-intervention rates and thrombosis in the following year, and reduced long-term functional patency. In patients presenting electively, primary SG rather than angioplasty led to significantly reduced thrombosis rates, a longer time to re-intervention in the following year, and superior long-term functional patency. The use of SG was the same in both groups. Both the mode of presentation and the type of intervention performed were independently predictive of a poorer subsequent functional patency. CONCLUSIONS: Primary elective stent-grafting may be the optimal strategy to reducing maintenance costs with ecAVG.

Screening and surveillance of venous stenosis in AVG: Is it time to rethink our assumptions?

Guidelines make no firm recommendations about surveillance of arteriovenous grafts as several randomised trials (RCT) have not shown a clear benefit in patency. However a more thorough review of these RCT based on epidemiological principles reveals significant limitations. In particular a key weakness of these older studies is the interventions performed for venous stenosis detected that was largely angioplasty. However, the observational data of modern stent-grafts shows a clear benefit over angioplasty, and thus seems to suggest that a modern well considered RCT is now mandated.

Validation of a vascular access specific quality of life measure (VASQoL).

BACKGROUND: A self-administered 11 item vascular access specific quality of life measure (VASQoL) was previously derived from detailed qualitative interviews with adult patients with kidney failure who have experienced vascular access using the Capabilities Approach as a theoretical base. This study reports the psychometric validation of the VASQoL measure including its reliability, content validity and responsiveness to change. METHODS: Cognitive interviews were conducted with 23 adult patients with kidney failure after completion of the VASQoL measure. Focus group discussion with a vascular access professional multidisciplinary team was undertaken (n = 8) and subsequently a further 101 adult kidney failure patients with vascular access (TCVC, AVF or AVG) completed the digital VASQoL measure, EQ-5D and SF-36 questionnaires in a longitudinal study with prospectively recorded vascular access events. RESULTS: Transcript analysis of cognitive interviews after VASQoL completion indicated that the content was comprehensive and well understood by participants. Assessment of Internal reliability for the VASQoL measure was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.858). Test-retest reliability of the overall VASQoL measure was high (intra class correlation coefficient 0.916). In those patients who experienced a vascular access event, significant differences were observed in paired analysis of the VASQoL physical domain questions and vascular access function domain questions and in the EQ-5D usual activities, pain and anxiety domains. In those with no vascular access event, variation was observed in longitudinal analysis in VASQoL questions relating to worry about VA function and capability domains, whilst no variation was observed in the EQ5D measure. CONCLUSION: The VASQoL measure has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and responsiveness to change for clinically relevant vascular access outcomes. This provides a validated, vascular access specific quality of life measure that can be used in future trials of vascular access, evaluation of new technologies and routine use as a patient reported outcome measure (PROM).

The impact of stent-graft sizing on venous stenosis re-intervention and arteriovenous graft patency: Free-floating stent outflow is associated with improved outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) for dialysis access are limited by reintervention for venous stenosis (VS) despite their good initial patency. Whilst stent-grafts (SG) have shown promise, the optimal sizing is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to determine if outflow vein diameter, SG diameter or these relative to each other (V:Sr) alters outcomes, and if so, which is more important. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of Gore® Acuseal® ecAVGs with VS treated with Gore® Viabahn® SG over a 7-year period. Primary patency (PP), time to thrombosis and functional patency were analysed by SG length/diameter, vein diameter and V:Sr. RESULTS: We identified 114 ecAVGs with median follow-up 492 days (IQR 189-770). SG length and diameter did not correlate with PP, however, there was a significant relationship between vein diameter and PP (RR = 0.901 (0.832-0.975), p = 0.01) and between V:Sr and PP (RR = 0.462 (0.255-0.838), x2 = 5.866, p = 0.0015). The optimal V:Sr was ⩾1.4 (i.e. vein diameter at least 40% greater than the stent-graft; or 'free-floating' stent outflow) (RR = 2.759 (1.670-4.558), p < 0.001), translating to a difference in median PP of 252 versus 496 days (IQR: 188-316; 322-670). On multivariate analysis, absolute vein diameter lost significance, whilst V:Sr remained an independently significant predictor of PP (RR = 3.247 (1.560-6.759), p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the SG outflow into a relatively larger segment of vein was associated with a significant increase in PP independent of the absolute vein diameter. This suggests that larger calibre SG which are apposed to the vein wall are not required for optimal primary patency, and indeed should be actively avoided. Instead, a 'free-floating' stent outflow which is undersized relative to the recipient vein (whilst maintaining a minimum anchoring calibre) is recommended where possible. This should be considered during intervention and may require selection of longer devices, where practical, to bring the stent outflow into a larger vein segment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3a, Non-randomised controlled cohort/follow-up study.

A national co-design workshop of a mobile-based application for vascular access as a patient decision aid.

BACKGROUND: Increasing options for vascular access have increased the need for more effective communication to optimize patient engagement and ensure effective consent. An advanced prototype of the mobile application (VA App) was developed over 3 years as a patient decision aid. For the first time, entry to the 2021 UK Kidney Week was opened to all professions and patients and was held online. The VA App was presented in an inter-active session. This report summarizes the findings. METHODS: A 30-min interactive session was allocated with the session delivered in four sections: (1) demographic data was collected; (2) an overall opinion was obtained about current patient information sources and satisfaction with these; (3) the participants were asked a series of eight questions regarding the main problem areas previously identified; (4) following a 6-min demonstration video, the participants were then re-asked the same questions to determine if the VA App would improve/worsen these areas. RESULTS: Completed data from 30 participants showed great variation in all demographics. The most cited source was verbal and rated the best, whilst all other sources were felt to be poor by 90%. All eight aspects of current information sources rated poorly. There was a unanimous agreement that the VA App could make this better. Interestingly, when the eight aspects were ranked by order of the worst to best, this matched the order of the benefits of the VA App. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of an on-line, multi-professional co-design workshop. With a unanimous view that current systems are very limited and that better patient information systems are required, the VA App was found to be a potential solution as a patient decision aid. Interestingly, paper leaflets were widely viewed as the least used and the least effective mechanism for communicating information to patients. Funding for a commercially produced mobile application has been secured and will be further tested in the near future.

Patients' and Clinicians' Perspectives on the Acceptability of Completing Digital Quality of Life Questionnaires During Routine Haemodialysis Clinics: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Advanced chronic kidney disease is a serious and common medical condition with significant treatment choices incurring varying high treatment burdens. Better understanding on how to best collect quality of life (QoL) in this unique situation may help guide critical decisions. This study investigates the acceptability of digital QoL questionnaires completed during routine haemodialysis sessions. Qualitative data was collected from patient (n=23) and clinical researcher (n=2) interviews alongside analysis of data from questionnaires completed by patients (n=101) during a 6-week validation study. Interviews refined the content and format of digital QoL questionnaires and provided novel insights regarding how patients assessed and completed QoL questions. This study suggests collecting QoL data using digital tablet technology during routine haemodialysis clinics is both feasible and acceptable to patients and has provided novel insights that are not routinely available with traditional methods.

Application and implications of a standardised reporting system for arteriovenous access graft infection.

INTRODUCTION: The perception that arteriovenous graft infection (AVGi) is frequent and severe is not based on contemporary data from large units using modern AVG. Furthermore, older reports compounded misperceptions by using non-standardised reporting that prevents easy comparison against the alternative modalities. The aim of this article is to use a recently published reporting scheme to analyse the frequency, management and outcome of AVGi in a large series of sequential early-cannulation AVG with long-term follow-up. METHODS: A single-center series analysis was performed of 277 early-cannulation AVG with minimum 1-year follow-up (total 120,082 days). Infections relating to the AVG were classified, root-cause analysed and the outcomes presented. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of all AVG implanted (51 episodes) developed infection related to the AVG. Primary AVGi (related to the insertion procedure or within 28 days) occurred in 9 (3%); secondary AVGi (related to AVG in use) occurred 33 times (rate 0.27/1000 haemodialysis days), at a mean of 382 days, and tertiary AVGi (in AVG no longer in use) occurred nine times. Only 1/3 of all AVGi led to bacteraemia, and ½ did not lead to loss of functional access. SUMMARY: AVG infection is not common, caused a systemic infection in only one-third, did not lead to metastatic infection, and importantly, was treatable without loss of access in one-half of all cases. Using an objective system that discriminates between aetiology and outcome allows a more complete objective understanding of relative infection risks and outcomes for AVG that can inform discussions with patients requiring vascular access for haemodialysis.

Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study protocol : a randomised controlled trial comparing primary unassisted patency at 1 year of primary arteriovenous fistulae created under regional compared to local anaesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the 'gold standard' vascular access for haemodialysis. Universal usage is limited, however, by a high early failure rate. Several small, single-centre studies have demonstrated better early patency rates for AVF created under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with local anaesthesia (LA). The mechanistic hypothesis is that the sympathetic blockade associated with RA causes vasodilatation and increased blood flow through the new AVF. Despite this, considerable variation in practice exists in the UK. A high-quality, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to definitively inform practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study is a multicentre, observer-blinded RCT comparing primary radiocephalic/brachiocephalic AVF created under regional versus LA. The primary outcome is primary unassisted AVF patency at 1 year. Access-specific (eg, stenosis/thrombosis), patient-specific (including health-related quality of life) and safety secondary outcomes will be evaluated. Health economic analysis will also be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ACCess study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research and ethics committee number 3 (20/WS/0178). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of completion of the trial. We will also present our findings at key national and international renal and anaesthetic meetings, and support dissemination of trial outcomes via renal patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14153938. SPONSOR: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde GN19RE456, Protocol V.1.3 (8 May 2021), REC/IRAS ID: 290482.

Clinical factors associated with severe hypophosphataemia after kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which hypophosphataemia develops following kidney transplantation remains debated, and limited research is available regarding risk factors. This study aimed to assess the association between recipient and donor variables, and the severity of post-transplantation hypophosphataemia. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective observational study. We assessed the association between demographic, clinical and biochemical variables and the development of hypophosphataemia. We used linear regression analysis to assess association between these variables and phosphate nadir. RESULTS: 87.6% of patients developed hypophosphataemia. Patients developing hypophosphataemia were younger, had a shorter time on renal replacement therapy, were less likely to have had a parathyroidectomy or to experience delayed graft function, were more likely to have received a living donor transplant, from a younger donor. They had higher pre-transplantation calcium levels, and lower alkaline phosphatase levels. Receipt of a living donor transplant, lower donor age, not having had a parathyroidectomy, receiving a transplant during the era of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, not having delayed graft function, higher pre-transplantation calcium, and higher pre-transplantation phosphate were associated with lower phosphate nadir by multiple linear regression. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates an association between variables relating to better graft function and hypophosphataemia. The links with biochemical measures of mineral-bone disease remain less clear.

A critical review of surgical strategies to minimise venous stenosis in arteriovenous grafts.

It is inevitable that complications arising from surgical procedures are ascribed to surgical technique, and this applies to venous stenosis (VS) in arteriovenous grafts. However, despite a wide range of cellular studies, computer modelling, observational series and clinical trials, there remains uncertainty on whether surgical technique contributes to VS. This article reviews evidence from basic science, fluid dynamics and clinical data to try and rationalise the main surgical options to modify the occurrence of venous stenosis. There is sufficient data from diverse sources to make recommendations on clinical practice (size of target vein, shape of anastomosis, angle of approach, distance from venous needling, trauma to the target vein) whilst at the same time this emphasises the need to carefully report the practical aspects of surgical technique in future clinical trials.